hipercom
Client

INTERSNACK ROMANIA — Snacking

Weekly Leaflet Promo Intelligence
2026-W34 2026-08-17 → 2026-08-23
1

Executive Summary

2026-W34
Market : Hot
Promo pressure above 4-week average — intense promotional activity.
Promoted assortment breadth
% SKUs on promo / all SKUs seen in leaflets over the last 24 months
9.3%
189 promoted SKUs / 2036 referenced
▲ 0.8 pp vs Y-1
▼ 2.3 pp vs last 4 weeks
Distinct Operations
Distinct catalogues / POs
40
275 promo occurrences across 40 operations
▲ 5 vs Y-1
▼ 1 vs last 4 weeks
Average max discount
Ø max discount
24.3%
▲ 0.4 pp vs Y-1
▲ 1.4 pp vs last 4 weeks
Cumulative Visibility ?
Σ visibility scores
1344
▲ 1.7% vs Y-1
▼ 26.9% vs last 4 weeks
Top 2 Concentration ?
Visibility share of top 2 producers
54.2%
INTERSNACK ROMANIA + STAR FOODS
▲ 2.8 pp vs Y-1
▲ 1.9 pp vs last 4 weeks

INTERSNACK ROMANIA

Promoted assortment breadth
% SKUs on promo / all SKUs seen in leaflets over the last 24 months
19.5%
45 promoted SKUs / 231 referenced
▲ 2.6 pp vs Y-1
▼ 5.3 pp vs last 4 weeks
Distinct Operations
Distinct catalogues / POs
29
85 promo occurrences across 29 operations
▲ 2 vs Y-1
▼ 0 vs last 4 weeks
Average max discount
Ø max discount
21.8%
▼ 3.0 pp vs Y-1
▲ 1.4 pp vs last 4 weeks
Cumulative Visibility ?
Σ visibility scores
465
▼ 2.7% vs Y-1
▼ 21.2% vs last 4 weeks
Promo operations penetration rate
Share of category promotional operations
72.5%
▼ 4.6 pp vs Y-1
▲ 1.6 pp vs last 4 weeks
Share of Voice (Visibility) ?
Share of promotional catalogue visibility (weighted score)
34.6%
▼ 1.6 pp vs Y-1
▲ 2.5 pp vs last 4 weeks

Objective Executive Summary: Moderate Visibility Decrease for INTERSNACK ROMANIA

The manufacturer INTERSNACK ROMANIA activated 19.5% of its reference catalog in promotions, exceeding the category benchmark of 9.3%. Despite this activation, the share of voice (SOV) has decreased to 34.6% across 45 promoted SKUs.
INTERSNACK ROMANIA's promotional activities are represented in 85 leaflet occurrences across 20 distinct retail chains, achieving an 83.3% network coverage. However, this selective presence has not compensated for the overall decline in exposure.
The average maximum leaflet discount for INTERSNACK ROMANIA is 21.8%, which is lower than the market average of 24.3%, reflecting a -2.5 percentage point difference. This indicates a more moderate discount strategy compared to the category average.

Conclusion

The current strategic overview indicates a moderate decrease in visibility for INTERSNACK ROMANIA, with a share of voice of 34.6%. Although the manufacturer has activated a higher percentage of its catalog for promotions, the overall exposure remains compromised despite substantial network coverage. Furthermore, the average discount depth is less aggressive than the market average, suggesting a cautious pricing strategy in a competitive landscape.
2

Promo Pressure by Retailer

275 occurrences • 24 retailers
Promotional Dynamics in the Snacking Category
This week, the Snacking category showcases a robust promotional landscape with a total of 275 occurrences across 24 retail chains. INTERSNACK ROMANIA is prominently featured in 20 of these retail partners, achieving 85 leaflet occurrences. The promotional activity is notably led by KAUFLAND and MEGA IMAGE, which together contribute to 25.8% of the total promotional volume with 43 and 28 occurrences, respectively. KAUFLAND stands out as the leading retail partner for INTERSNACK ROMANIA, accounting for 15.3% of its promotional occurrences with 13 instances. Furthermore, PROFI DISCOUNT emerges as the retailer offering the most aggressive promotional discounts in the category, boasting an average maximum discount of 31.2%, significantly surpassing the category benchmark of 23.3%. This highlights the competitive nature of the market and the importance of strategic partnerships in driving promotional effectiveness.
INTERSNACK ROMANIA maintains a strong presence in a competitive landscape.
#RetailerSKU in Promo OccurrencesVisibility Σ scoresAvg max discount Ø max discountSKU Share of Voice
1 Logo KAUFLAND 43 328.0 27.0% 15.4%
2 Logo MEGA IMAGE 28 72.0 20.6% 10.3%
3 Logo LIDL 23 85.0 20.0% 8.5%
4 Logo PENNY 21 93.0 22.2% 7.7%
5 Logo ANNABELLA 18 137.0 25.7% 6.6%
6 Logo CARREFOUR 18 112.0 20.1% 5.9%
7 Logo PROFI 15 75.0 25.9% 5.5%
8 Logo SUPECO 15 37.0 — 5.5%
9 Logo SELGROS 12 58.0 28.5% 4.4%
10 Logo UNICARM 12 22.0 — 4.4%
3

Competitive Activity

35 producers • 56 brands
INTERSNACK ROMANIA maintains a strong position with 34.6% SOV, closely trailing the market leader.

Top 10 Producers — Visibility

Top 10 Brands — Visibility

In the current promotional landscape of the Snacking category, 35 manufacturers and 56 brands are actively participating, with INTERSNACK ROMANIA holding a significant 34.6% share of voice (SOV). This positions INTERSNACK ROMANIA as a key player, effectively tied with the market leader, thereby indicating a highly competitive environment. The visibility is predominantly concentrated among the top three producers, which collectively account for 60.5% of the total category visibility. Notably, CHIO emerges as the most visible brand within promotional leaflets. Additionally, EUROPEAN FOODS is identified as the fastest-growing competitor in terms of visibility, suggesting a potential shift in market dynamics that could impact INTERSNACK ROMANIA's positioning moving forward.
4

Focus INTERSNACK ROMANIA

vs market
INTERSNACK ROMANIA
34.6%
Visibility share • 85 promo occurrences
Rest of market
65.4%
Visibility share • 190 promo occurrences
BrandVisibilityPromo OccurrencesSKUsAvg max discount
CHIO 301.0 45 25 23.9%
NUTLINE (INTERSNACK) 141.0 35 15 19.8%
POM-BAR 23.0 5 5 17.2%
5

Promo Price Trends

Scenario: STABLE

Avg. promo price / unit [l;m;kg;pcs;m²] (12 weeks)

Avg. max discount (12 weeks)

In W34, INTERSNACK ROMANIA's average minimum advertised promo price (MAP) stands at 54.15 Lei, reflecting a significant +13.9% gap compared to the category benchmark of 47.56 Lei. Over the past 12 weeks, INTERSNACK ROMANIA has consistently maintained a competitive price advantage, averaging 50.75 Lei compared to 48.25 Lei for the category. The analysis of promotional volatility indicates that W27 experienced the highest peak, with an average maximum discount of 27.8% for INTERSNACK ROMANIA, surpassing the market average of 24.5%, coinciding with its lowest unit price point of 49.4 Lei. Furthermore, the data reveals a strong inverse correlation (r = -0.26) between discount depth and unit price, suggesting that as the discount increases, the unit price tends to decrease. Following a stabilization phase characterized by moderate discounting between W27 and W30, INTERSNACK ROMANIA has adjusted its promotional discount to 21.8% in W34, aligning closely with the market average of 24.3%.
6

Promotional Mechanics Mix

Dominant: Crossed price (37.5%)

Global Breakdown

MechanicPromosShare
Crossed price 103 37.5%
Promotions without consumer advantages 69 25.1%
UNKNOWN 37 13.5%
X% From the 2nd product (identical) 23 8.4%
Card 15 5.5%
Price Discount 9 3.3%
Virtual lots with free products 8 2.9%
Application 7 2.5%
Special price 2 0.7%
Loyalty points - cumulating points 2 0.7%
7

Top Promotions of the Week

Two Top 10 rankings: discount depth and visibility

🏷️ Top 10 — Discount Depth

#RetailerBrandDiscountPriceVis.
1 SHOP & GO LAY'S TOTAL 60.0% — 3.0
2 SHOP & GO LAY'S TOTAL 60.0% — 3.0
3 Logo MEGA IMAGE LAY'S TOTAL 60.0% — 3.0
4 Logo MEGA IMAGE LAY'S TOTAL 60.0% — 3.0
5 Logo KAUFLAND PIRIFAN 50.0% 29.67 Lei 9.0 ⭐
6 Logo CARREFOUR MARKET MARCA NEIDENTIFICABILA 40.0% 55.94 Lei 6.0 ⭐
7 Logo CARREFOUR MARCA NEIDENTIFICABILA 40.0% 55.94 Lei 3.0 ⭐
8 Logo SELGROS CHIO 39.0% 35.24 Lei 10.0 ⭐
9 Logo KAUFLAND POM-BAR 38.0% 37.2 Lei 9.0
10 PROFI DISCOUNT LAY'S TOTAL 35.0% 49.48 Lei 9.0

👁️ Top 10 — Visibility

#RetailerBrandVis.Discount
1 Logo SELGROS LAY'S TOTAL 30.0 —
2 Logo KAUFLAND CHIO 18.0 33.0%
3 Logo KAUFLAND CHIO 18.0 33.0%
4 Logo KAUFLAND CHIO 18.0 33.0%
5 Logo ANNABELLA LAY'S TOTAL 18.0 33.0%
6 Logo KAUFLAND K-CLASSIC 18.0 30.0%
7 Logo KAUFLAND DORITOS 18.0 30.0%
8 Logo CARREFOUR MARKET LOTTO PUFULETI 18.0 20.0%
9 Logo CARREFOUR DRAG DE ROMANIA 18.0 20.0%
10 Logo CARREFOUR MARKET LAY'S TOTAL 18.0 12.0%
8

Private Label vs National Brands

Private Label
15.8%
43 promos • 39 SKUs • Max Discount 19.5%
National Brand
84.2%
230 promos • 149 SKUs • Max Discount 24.7%
In this week's leaflets, national brands dominate with 84.2% of promotional volume (230 occurrences across 149 SKUs) and 84.3% share of voice, while private labels account for 15.8% of volume (43 occurrences across 39 SKUs) and 15.7% share of voice. The average maximum discount for private labels is 19.5% (MAP: 10.01 Lei), whereas national brands offer a higher average maximum discount of 24.7% (MAP: 5.68 Lei). Notably, private label share of voice shows a negligible decline of -1.8 pp compared to the previous week.
9

News & Alerts (vs last 24 months)

⚠️ CHIO — INTERSNACK ROMANIA
Discount this week: 39.0% (historical avg: 24.1%, delta: +62.1%)
at SELGROS
⚠️ CHIO — INTERSNACK ROMANIA
Discount this week: 33.0% (historical avg: 21.8%, delta: +51.4%)
at KAUFLAND
⚠️ CHIO — INTERSNACK ROMANIA
Discount this week: 29.0% (historical avg: 19.7%, delta: +47.1%)
at KAUFLAND
⚠️ STAR TOTAL — STAR FOODS
Discount this week: 25.0% (historical avg: 17.0%, delta: +47.1%)
at ANNABELLA
⚠️ MOGYI — MOGYI ROMANIA
Discount this week: 30.0% (historical avg: 21.0%, delta: +42.9%)
at KAUFLAND
📈 📈 Visibility peak — CHIO
Visibility score: 18.0 (avg 4.2, factor: x4.3)
📈 📈 Visibility peak — MOGYI
Visibility score: 3.0 (avg 1.0, factor: x3.0)
📈 📈 Visibility peak — LOTTO CHIPS
Visibility score: 3.0 (avg 1.0, factor: x3.0)
📈 📈 Visibility peak — CHIO
Visibility score: 19.0 (avg 6.5, factor: x2.9)
📈 📈 Visibility peak — DRAG DE ROMANIA
Visibility score: 34.0 (avg 11.9, factor: x2.9)
🆕 LAY'S TOTAL — New item — LAY'S TOTAL
CHIPSURI PAPRIKA (STAR FOODS) — CARREFOUR
🆕 ULKER — New item — ULKER
BISCUITI CASCAVAL CIZI (ULKER ROMANIA) — SUPECO
🆕 BEST PEANUTS — New item — BEST PEANUTS
ARAHIDE IN COAJA SARATE (BEST FOODS PRODUCTIONS SRL) — PROFI DISCOUNT
🆕 MOGYI — New item — MOGYI
MEXICORN CHILLI (MOGYI ROMANIA) — MEGA IMAGE
🆕 NATURE'S PROMISE — New item — NATURE'S PROMISE
SARATELE ROSII-USTUROI (DELHAIZE) — MEGA IMAGE
10

Conclusion & Recommendations

The significant downturn in leaflet promotional exposure indicates a need for strategic reassessment to enhance visibility and competitiveness in the market.
💡 Increase collaboration with key retailers to ensure more prominent placement in their promotional materials.
💡 Develop targeted marketing campaigns that leverage digital platforms to complement traditional leaflet strategies.
💡 Conduct a competitive analysis to identify gaps in promotional strategies and adjust offerings to better meet market demands.
Immediate action is required to reverse the downward trend and strengthen market positioning.
📖

How to Read This Newsletter

This guide explains each section and metric used in this weekly newsletter.

1 — Promoted assortment breadth
Promo Pressure — Share of SKUs observed in promotion vs. the total referenced universe.
1 — Distinct Operations
Distinct Operations — Number of distinct catalogues or promotional operations detected during the week.
1 — Average max discount
Average max discount — Mean max discount depth (%) across all promotional occurrences.
1 — Cumulative Visibility
Cumulative Visibility — Sum of all individual visibility scores.
1 — Top 2 Concentration
Top 2 Concentration — Share of total visibility captured by the two most visible producers.
2 — Promo Pressure by Retailer
Promo Pressure by Retailer — Table ranking retailers by number of promo occurrences, total visibility, average discount depth, and number of distinct SKUs on promo.
3 — Competitive Activity
Competitive Activity — Comparative table of competitive positions across key promotional KPIs for major retailers, with a championship podium ranking.
4 — Focus INTERSNACK ROMANIA
Focus Producer — Compares the selected producer's promotional footprint against the rest of the market.
5 — Promo Price Trends
Promo Price Trends — Table comparing the most frequent price ranges (MAP) across retailers over 5 periods, with trend indicators.
6 — Promotional Mechanics Mix
Promotional Mechanics Mix — Table showing the breakdown of promotion types with mini pie chart indicators for each retailer.
7 — Top Promotions of the Week
Top promotions of the week — Two Top 10 rankings: by maximum discount depth (with ⭐ lowest observed price flags over 24 months) and by leaflet visibility score.
8 — Private Label vs National Brands
Displayed Discount Rate — Share of promotions that explicitly display a numerical discount percentage. Comparison across retailers over 5 periods, with trend indicators.
9 — News & Alerts (vs last 24 months)
News & Alerts — Flags products appearing in promotion for the first time within 24 months and unusual KPI deviations.
🏷️ Audited Topic Entities: Snacking • INTERSNACK ROMANIA • KAUFLAND • MEGA IMAGE • LIDL • PENNY • ANNABELLA • CARREFOUR • PROFI • SUPECO • SELGROS • UNICARM • Romania (RO)
ℹ️ Audit information, methodology & FAQ (Rozwiń ↓)
📍 Market & Territory: Romania (RO)
🏷️ Category: Snacking
🎯 Audited Entity: INTERSNACK ROMANIA
📊 Audit Pillar: Brand Leaflet & Promo Share of Voice Audit
🛒 Monitored Retailers: KAUFLAND, MEGA IMAGE, LIDL, PENNY, ANNABELLA, CARREFOUR, PROFI, SUPECO, SELGROS, UNICARM
❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) — Audit Data & Methodology:
Q: What was the Share of Voice (SOV) of INTERSNACK ROMANIA in Romania during Week 34 2026?

During Week 34 2026 in Romania, INTERSNACK ROMANIA achieved a 34.6% Share of Voice in Snacking across retailers including KAUFLAND, MEGA IMAGE, LIDL, PENNY.

Q: What was the average maximum discount for INTERSNACK ROMANIA in Week 34?

The average maximum discount recorded for INTERSNACK ROMANIA was 21.8% across audited promotional flyers.

Q: Who is the HiperCom analytics and methodology lead?

The trade marketing audit and data methodology are verified by Yves Frérot, Lead Data Analyst & Head of Methodology (yves.frerot@hiper-com.eu).

Official Source: HiperCom / FCube FMCG Retail Intelligence Database • Verified by: Yves Frérot (Lead Data Analyst & Head of Methodology)
Manager
Schedule meeting →